A brief introduction
finishing | possession | defending | goalkeeping | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Success depends on:
When the goal is to place individuals on a scale
DCMs do not distinguish within classes
finishing | possession | defending | goalkeeping | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Latent class models use responses to probabilistically place individuals into latent classes
DCMs are confirmatory latent class models
Respondents (r): The individuals from whom behavioral data are collected
Items (i): Assessment questions used to classify/diagnose respondents
Attributes (a): Unobserved latent categorical characteristics underlying the behaviors (i.e., diagnostic status)
Diagnostic Assessment: The method used to elicit behavioral data
With binary attributes, there are \(2^A\) possible profiles
Example 2-attribute assessment:
[0, 0]
[1, 0]
[0, 1]
[1, 1]
\[ \color{#D55E00}{P(X_r=x_r)} = \sum_{c=1}^C\color{#009E73}{\nu_c} \prod_{i=1}^I\color{#56B4E9}{\pi_{ic}^{x_{ir}}(1-\pi_{ic})^{1 - x_{ir}}} \]
Numerous DCMs have been developed over the years
Each DCM makes different assumptions about how attributes proficiencies combine/interact to produce an item response
Must be proficient in all attributes measured by the item to provide a correct response
Deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA; de la Torre & Douglas, 2004)
Must be proficient in at least 1 attribute measured by the item to provide a correct response
Deterministic inputs, noisy “or” gate (DINO; Templin & Henson, 2006)
Different response probabilities for each class (partially compensatory)
Log-linear cognitive diagnostic model (LCDM; Henson et al., 2009)
This will be our focus
Item measures only 1 attribute
\[ \text{logit}(X_i = 1) = \color{#D7263D}{\lambda_{i,0}} + \color{#219EBC}{\lambda_{i,1(1)}}\color{#009E73}{\alpha} \]
Item measures multiple attributes
\[ \text{logit}(X_i = 1) = \color{#D7263D}{\lambda_{i,0}} + \color{#4B3F72}{\lambda_{i,1(1)}\alpha_1} + \color{#9589BE}{\lambda_{i,1(2)}\alpha_2} + \color{#219EBC}{\lambda_{i,2(1,2)}\alpha_1\alpha_2} \]
Attribute and item relationships are defined in the Q-matrix
Q-matrix
So called “general” DCM because the LCDM subsumes other DCMs
Constraints on item parameters make LCDM equivalent to other DCMs (e.g., DINA and DINO)
Diagnostic classification models
A brief introduction